Managers, My original email is below. I received one reply, which was from Darren Dunham, and he hit the nail on the head. His reply was: ========================================================================== Already in use....Are you running a bootp server? "ps -ef | grep boot" While solaris doesn't come with one, the jetadmin stuff from HP does come with a bootp server. They use the same port, so you can only use one or the other. ========================================================================== bootpd was running on the server. I killed that process and all worked perfectly. Thanks, Darren! -- Darryl -----Original Message----- From: sunmanagers-admin@sunmanagers.org [mailto:sunmanagers-admin@sunmanagers.org]On Behalf Of Darryl Pace Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:34 PM To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org Subject: in.dhcpd problem Managers, On an E4500 running Solaris 7, I am attempting to upgrade Sunray software from version 1.2 to version 1.3. Sunrays were running successfully on version 1.2. However, after upgrading to 1.3 the dhcp daemon will not start. When I try to add an interface using utadm, the dhcp daemon croaks. When I manually do what the utadm script is trying to do, here's what happens (I added the -d and -v options for debugging and verbosity): # /usr/lib/inet/in.dhcpd -dv Daemon Version: 3.1 Maximum relay hops: 4 Run mode is: DHCP Server Mode. Datastore: files Path: /var/dhcp DHCP offer TTL: 10 ICMP validation timeout: 1000 milliseconds, Attempts: 2. (errno: 125) BIND: Address already in use (errno: 125) Cannot configure any interfaces. Daemon terminated. When I run "ps -ef | grep dhcp", nothing shows up. When I truss the command, I get the following: 3787/1: so_socket(2, 1, 0, "", 1) = 4 3787/1: setsockopt(4, 65535, 32, 0xFFBEFAB4, 4, 1) = 0 3787/1: bind(4, 0xFFBEFAA4, 16, 3) Err#125 EADDRINUSE 3787/1: AF_INET name = 0.0.0.0 port = 67 3787/1: fstat(-1, 0xFFBEEA68) Err#9 EBADF 3787/1: open("/dev/conslog", O_WRONLY) = 5 However, when looking for used ports with the netstat command, port number 67 does not show up. I believe I have applied all relevant patches (but, if you have any suggestions for patches, please forward them). Do you have any suggestions on how I might solve, circumvent, or further troubleshoot this problem? Thanks for your help. -- Darryl _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Wed Oct 31 22:08:18 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:27 EST