Thanks for the the quick response to: Blake Matheny [blake.r.matheny@mail.sprint.com] Bertrand_Hutin@notes.amdahl.com Neill, Mark (MBS) [Mark.Neill@mortgagefamily.com] SUMMARY: Yes, I do need cross cables to direct connect machines to each other and my original ifconfig hme2 192.1.2.233 192.1.1.234 up worked fine in the end. BUT: I should stick to the intranet address-ranges (192.168.x.x u.o.) to be on the safe side and the final clue is: PCI-slot0 associates with device hme2 PCI-slot1 associates with device hme1 and not the other way around! This command helped me out to verify connections: # snoop -d hme2 ... So it's clear enough that I forgot to supertest all steps before judging. Now that I know that numbers mix up this way, it does make sense to me in a special Unix way. Jeroen Visser Email: jvisser@netcast.nl > -----Original Message----- > > Admins, > > I've been trying to interconnect several 250-boxes running > Solaris 2.6. So far the three machines connect to a switch in a > regular subnet (194.151.217.224 mask 255.255.255.240) wich holds > the default gateway as well (i.e. 194.151.217.225). That works > fine. They use the interface hme0 located right below the serial > ports A/B. > > I want to use extra network cards mounted in PCI-slot 0 and 1 to use > a direct cable connect for special front/backend communication. > The middle machine should be able to see the > other two. I've been told that any IP-address will work > here as long as it does not interfere with the existing subnet. > Additionally I am not sure to use a crosslink cable (neither worked > so far). > > I have tryed to ifconfig hme1 and hme2 as follows, with a variation > of IP-addresses on each host (...232 ...233 ...234): > > >>on host1 (the middle machine) > # ifconfig hme2 192.1.2.233 192.1.1.234 up > # ifconfig -a > lo0: flags=849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 8232 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 > hme0: flags=863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 194.151.217.233 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 194.151.217.239 > ether 8:0:20:a9:95:58 > hme1: flags=842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0 > ether 8:0:20:a9:95:58 > hme2: flags=851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.1.2.233 --> 192.1.1.234 netmask ffffff00 > ether 8:0:20:a9:95:58 > # netstat -nvr > IRE Table: > Destination Mask Gateway Device Mxfrg > Rtt Ref Flg Out In/Fwd > -------------------- --------------- -------------------- ------ ----- > ----- --- --- ----- ------ > 192.1.1.234 255.255.255.255 192.1.2.233 hme2 1500* > 0 2 UH 48 0 > 194.151.217.224 255.255.255.240 194.151.217.233 hme0 1500* > 0 3 U 110 0 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 194.151.217.233 hme0 1500* > 0 3 U 0 0 > default 0.0.0.0 194.151.217.225 1500* > 0 0 UG 0 0 > 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 lo0 8232* > 0 0 UH 295 0 > > >>and on host2 (the right end machine) > # ifconfig hme1 192.1.1.234 192.1.2.233 up > # ifconfig -a > lo0: flags=849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 8232 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 > hme0: flags=863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 194.151.217.234 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 194.151.217.239 > ether 8:0:20:c4:40:36 > hme1: flags=851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.1.1.234 --> 192.1.2.233 netmask ffffff00 > ether 8:0:20:c4:40:36 > hme2: flags=842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0 > ether 8:0:20:c4:40:36 > # netstat -nvr > IRE Table: > Destination Mask Gateway Device Mxfrg > Rtt Ref Flg Out In/Fwd > -------------------- --------------- -------------------- ------ ----- > ----- --- --- ----- ------ > 192.1.2.233 255.255.255.255 192.1.1.234 hme1 1500* > 0 2 UH 42 0 > 194.151.217.224 255.255.255.240 194.151.217.234 hme0 1500* > 0 3 U 3 0 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 194.151.217.234 hme0 1500* > 0 3 U 0 0 > default 0.0.0.0 194.151.217.225 1500* > 0 0 UG 0 0 > 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 lo0 8232* > 0 0 UH 22 0 > > > Then let them ping each other, showing (after a while): > no answer from 192.1.2.233 > > > Is there something I'm missing here? > > thanks for your time, > > > Jeroen Visser > Email: jvisser@netcast.nl >Received on Tue Apr 24 13:03:29 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 23 2016 - 16:24:53 EDT