Thanks to: Jay Lessert Kevin Buterbaugh Mike Kiernan Mike Kiernan wondered if we had applied the patches (which included the latest kernel patch) in single-user mode (we hadn't). He suspects that applying the patch when not in run-level S could have caused the problem we saw. Up to now, we have always applied patches from a directory that is accessed via NFS so as to minimize the downtime to only the time needed to reboot the machine (for some of our older systems, the patching takes several hours). At the risk of spawning another discussion thread, how many of you out there do/don't take the system down to "S" when patching? We've never noted any problems up to now. All three agreed that journaled file systems, via enabling the "logging" option in /etc/vfstab, is the way to go! Jay Lessert wondered why it is not enabled by default. After seeing our firewall come up in 90 seconds after a crash, I am a journaled file-system true-believer. Kevin Buterbaugh added this caveat: "There is one potential issue that I'm aware of. If you've got database servers with the databases in UFS filesystems (as opposed to raw disk), then you should mount those filesystems with the forcedirectio option. However, forcedirectio and logging are mutually exclusive apparently." Thanks to all. --Kevin ______________________________________________________________________ Kevin Tyle, Systems Administrator ********************** Dept. of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences ktyle@atmos.albany.edu University at Albany, ES-235 518-442-4571 (voice) 1400 Washington Avenue 518-442-5825 (fax) Albany, NY 12222 ********************** ______________________________________________________________________Received on Fri Aug 17 19:32:12 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 23 2016 - 16:25:02 EDT