Thanks to everyone who replied to my request. People were correct in identifying that the system does have a large number of small files rather than a few large files. "The speed of restore depends heavily on the number of files being restored, because 'ufsrestore' updates directory entries and data for each file, which may be in different areas of the disk. This causes disk arm movement, which has a high latency. 'ufsdump' does not have this problem, since it maps all file blocks in the beginning, and uses multiple buffers in order to stream the tape" The advice I received suggested that the time taken for the restore wasn't much of a surprise and that to improve on this I should try the following advice: 1) Compile yourself a copy of Casper Dik's fastfs. (http://www.science.uva.nl/pub/solaris/fastfs.c.gz). % sudo fastfs /a1 status /a1 is slow. % sudo fastfs /a1 fast /a1 is now fast % sudo ufsrestore etc., etc. % sudo fastfs /a1 slow /a1 is now slow This turns off *all* synchronous file system operations, and will get ufsrestore time within a factor of two of ufsdump time. You never leave a production file system in fast mode; a power failure in the middle of your ufsrestore probably requires a newfs to recover (but who cares, you've lost nothing). But it is *fast* and is how I always do my full restores. 2) Put it in logging mode: #device device mount FS fsck mount mount #to mount to fsck point type pass at boot options /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s0 /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s0 /a1 ufs 2 yes logging It is totally safe (you want to make sure you're running a reasonably recent patch cluster for Solaris 7), it is not quite as fast as 'fastfs fast', but you leave it on all the time, it nearly eliminates fscking, it is good stuff. A google search for solaris ufs logging will get you lots of background material. I don't have Solaris 7, but for sure on Solaris 8 you can play with logging on a live system without umount/mount by: % sudo mount -o remount,logging /a1 % sudo mount -o remount,nologging /a1 I think logging should be default; I run it on *all* my Solaris 8 boxes, period. Apparently the reason it's not default is that there can be pathological circumstances where logging slows the file system down. I've never experienced this myself, only major speedups on 'tar x' and 'rm -r', and freedom from fsck. 3) You could use the options "-rsf" (non verbose mode, non interactive) instead of "ivfs" which could probably save you some time. Thank you all once again for your help and reassurance that ufsdump/restore is the correct product to use. Jen McIntyre _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Tue Jan 22 17:57:45 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:32 EST