Hi again, After getting such fast responses, I now see this was probably something I should have known. The eeprom setting "boot-file" was set to "kernel/unix" which forces the system to boot in 32-bit mode. The guy who owns these machines swears he never changed this. Regardless, once I got rid of it, the system came up in 64-bit mode just fine. Thanks to: Phillips, John [john.phillips@calanais.com] Gilliam, Kirk R. [KGilliam@bcbsm.com] Homan, Charles (NE) [Charles.Homan@GDC4S.Com] Casper Dik [Casper.Dik@Sun.COM] -Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Richardson [mailto:grichardson@watercove.com] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:43 AM > To: 'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org' > Subject: Netra 1125 and 64-bit problem > > > Hi all, > > A user here has two Netra 1125's in his lab. The two machines > are almost > identical: > > 2x440mhz Ultra-Sparc-II processors, Boot v3.29, one with > 512MB RAM, the > other with 1024MB RAM > > We loaded Solaris 8 01/01 onto the first machine, and when it > boots up it > says the kernel is running in 64-bit. Cool. We load the > second machine with > the same OS, however this one says it in 32-bit mode. Huh? > > I grabbed my copy of Solaris 8 10/01 and we loaded that onto > the problem > machine. Still 32-bit mode. Not sure what to do next. > > Questions: Is this a hardware problem? If so, what > specifically? Processors? > Does the EEPROM have anything to do with telling the machine > whether to use > 32 or 64 bit? > > Thanks for any help! > > -Gary > _______________________________________________ > sunmanagers mailing list > sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org > http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers > _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Fri Apr 12 13:11:42 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:40 EST