Hello, First I'd like to re-state my original problem (hopefully more simply) and then the solution. When performing a jumpstart installation of Solaris 8 (02/02) using a flash archive, the install would appear to extract the entire archive yet the install would fail as follows: > ..... > Extracted 462.00 MB ( 99% of 462.13 MB archive) > Extracted 462.13 MB (100% of 462.13 MB archive) > > ERROR: Could not stop the extraction > > ERROR: Could not extract Flash archive > > ERROR: System installation failed > # Although if I rebooted the machine myself everything seemed ok, I new that the install still had to do some additional configuration and cleanup, and I was concerned that it was seeming to fail. Initially I thought that my problem was strictly to do with my Solaris jumpstart image because I was able to successfully install flash archives when using the Solaris CD-ROM directly vs. using an install image created by setup_install_server. IT turns out that the problems I was having were due to media issues of some kind - New Sol8 02/02 CDs create a wonderfully working jumpstart install image now. Also, when I had performed the install using the CD directly, I had also made changes to my jumpstart profile (oops, changed too many variables at once)! Unfortunately I discovered that my flash archive installations would still fail as above when ever I had lines in my jumpstart profile indicating that filesystems should be mounted via nfs: ..... filesys nfs-server-name:/usr/local - /usr/local ..... I determined that the apparent reason why the filesys lines involving NFS were causing the flash install to crash, were that my file systems (i.e. /usr/local) were shared read-only. I'm not sure why this really is an issue, but changing /etc/dfs/dfstab on the server (and running shareall) to: share -F nfs -o rw=sunlab:servers /usr/local Solves the problem - The flash archive installs correctly, the rest of the install (configuring of /etc/hosts, vfstab, Etc) continues, and the machine reboots and all is well. I guess I can't share /usr/local read-only <??> but at least root can't write to /usr/local from the workstations, and no other users will have permissions to do so anyhow. Thanks to those who replied to my earlier messages, I appreciate it. Ivan Fetch. _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Wed Apr 24 18:41:59 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:41 EST