I could not access large (> 2GB) files on filesystems exported from our E420R Solaris 8 (10/01) systems (latest recommended patches), from our SGI systems. This turned to be an SGI issue, the diversity of knowledge on this list never ceases to amaze me! Disabling automount and enabling autofs on the SGIs fixed the problem, which was that automountd was reverting to NFS version 2. We in fact had the same problem on all Sun systems, I just didn't realize it because in my testing I was mounting explicitly, bypassing the automounter. One person suggested patch 111197-02, but this replaces mountd and fixes "4389722 nfs mount of a file > 2GB is impossible", an unrelated issue. I'll include the following very useful reply from Andy McVey in its entirety: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The symptoms you describe are typical of an NFS version 2 mount rather than version 3. Check the /etc/fstab for manual mounts using vers=2 as an option. The mount command reports the version used: bubble 43: mount | grep ghost jaffa:/export/ghost on /home/ghost type nfs (vers=3,rw,intr,soft,noquota,nosuid,dev=140001) SGIs will try vers=2 if the server doesn't respond fast enough. This might happen if you're using Cisco switches and you haven't enabled the fast port spanning tree algorithm on the SGI's port. You'll see a lot of "server not responding" junk in the SYSLOG as the system boots up but eventually the mounts will succeed as version 2 mounts. Specify vers=3 in the fstab/automap to fix this. One other thing - make sure you're using autofsd and not automountd: bubblex 44: chkconfig | grep auto autofs on automount off bubblex 45: ps -ef | grep auto mcveya 45574 45333 0 09:20:58 pts/0 0:00 grep auto root 15788 1 0 Apr 04 ? 0:02 /usr/etc/autofsd -v -m 16 automountd is old, single threaded, unmaintained by SGI and more likely to cause tears than any other SGI supplied daemon (I worked in the support team for SGI Europe for several years - that's a qualified statement!) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In case enyone's interested, here's what I did to disable automount and enable autofs (adjust config files for your site; assumes an NIS source for "auto.direct"). Note that sometimes you have to run /usr/etc/autofs explicitly after a reboot to enable the new maps (this is supposed to be done automatically on bootup). #!/bin/csh -f #--------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Disable automount and enable autofs on SGI systems set hostname = `hostname` echo "Disable automount and enable autofs for $hostname" echo "Create /etc/auto_master" cp /etc/auto_master /etc/auto_master.bak cat >! /etc/auto_master << EOF /home auto.home -rw,soft,intr /- auto.direct -rw,soft,intr EOF echo "Create /etc/config/autofs.options" cp /etc/config/autofs.options /etc/config/autofs.options.bak set mounts = `ypcat -k auto.direct | grep $hostname | awk '{print $1}'` set arg = "-v -m 16" if ( $#mounts > 0 ) then foreach m ( $mounts ) set arg = "$arg $m -null" end endif echo $arg >! /etc/config/autofs.options echo "Disable automount and enable autofs" /etc/chkconfig -f automount off /etc/chkconfig -f autofs on echo "Reboot system for changes to take effect." exit 0 Thanks to: Matt D. Harris Andy McVey Osama Ahmed Weigert, Daniel Robert Konecny > > Platform: SunOS cressida 5.8 Generic_108528-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 > > Problem: > > On two E420R systems with recent recommended patches applied and > at Solaris 8 (10/01), we cannot see large (> 2GB) files on their > NFS mounts from our SGI systems running IRIX 6.5.14: > > $ ls -l /auto/keck1f > ls: /auto/keck1f/data3G.tif: File too large > > Other file utilities fail, as do basic C system calls. > > The NFS mounts are both T3 and A5100 disk arrays (only A5100's under > Veritas VM control), so this isn't related to VxVM. All disk > arrays are attached via fibre. > > I don't think this is an IRIX problem because we can see large > files on shares from all of our other Sun systems (U80, U60, E450). > What's even stranger, we can also see large files on the E420Rs' > system disk. > > The only difference with these two systems is that they were > set up for us by Sun SE personnel. The recommended patch cluster > installed on them is more recent than some of our other systems, so > I'm stumped. > > Has anyone else seen this behavior before? > > Dave Foster << All opinions expressed are mine, not the University's >> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= David Foster National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research Programmer/Analyst University of California, San Diego dfoster@ucsd.edu Department of Neuroscience, Mail 0608 (858) 534-7968 http://ncmir.ucsd.edu/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable." -- George Bernard Shaw _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Tue May 7 18:30:01 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:42 EST