Dear list members, thanks for all replies I got! Most answers pointed out that my nsswitch.conf is not configured properly: hosts: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files What I forgot to mention is that I am running our NIS in "DNS-forwarding mode", in /var/yp/Makefile I defined B=-b. So, name resolving was working and is working again, though I haven't done any changes to the system. Nevertheless, there was a consensus about not using nis at all for name resolving: hosts: files dns (or similar solutions) Another suggestion was shutting down nscd, because "it's evil". I will do that. Last but not least it was pointed out that nslookup is not a good way to test if name resolving is working or not since it "resolves names differently from the rest of the system." A better way of testing it is getent host <hostname> Again, thanks for all replies. The next time I have problems I will put all the suggsstion to work.... thanks to: Reggie Beavers, Martin Hepworth, Bertrand Hutin, John Riddoch, Ed Rolison, Lieven Marchand, Rafael Angarita, Joe Bernard, Steve Maher, Jay Lessert, Christopher Barnard, Fabrice Guerini. Original Post: > Dear list members, > > I have a rather odd problem here and I hope you have some suggestions about it, > because I almost lost hope *sigh* .... > > Our group has a small Sun cluster that is quite independent of most services of > our netprovider, a research site for high energy physics. One of the services we > use, though, is the naming service. And that one is giving us a lot of headaches > recently. > > Like today: All our machines can't access any web page or remote WS outside via > the machine name. I get a connection, though, if I use the IP number. Weirdly, > nslookup works fine and resolves all the names that won;t work put in ssh or > lynx or netscape or .... To make the confusion perfect, our Linux WS has no > problems at all, though it uses the same DNS. > > Probably this is a problem of our Provider. But since the only infected machines > in our subnet are our Sun WS, I wonder if there is anything I could do about it. > > We are not running named/in.named and as far as I can tell, the DNS is not > cached. We use NIS, and the 'hosts' line in the nsswitch.conf looks like this: > > hosts: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files > > I am not sure which version of the resolvlib is installed, the latest kernel > patch we are using is 105858-15 (I know, -16 is out and highly recommended, but > right now the machines are VERY busy...) > > If you need more information, let me know. Thanks in advance, > > Levent --------------------------------------------------------------------- Levent Demiroers kaa.desy.de/people/Demiroers.html _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Tue Oct 1 04:16:47 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:55 EST