[Summary] runaway dtsession errors

From: Chris Hoogendyk <choogend_at_library.umass.edu>
Date: Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:38:55 EST
The consensus is reboot.

Patching left the system in what is essentially an unstable state where 
the executables running in memory do not correspond to the libraries on 
disk. Reboot should bring it back up clean.

I cannot do it now, but I will do it early tomorrow morning. Assume it 
will work. If anything unusual happens I will ammend my summary.


---------------

Chris Hoogendyk

-
   O__  ---- Network Specialist & Unix Systems Administrator
  c/ /'_ --- Library Information Systems & Technology Services
 (*) \(*) -- W.E.B. Du Bois Library
~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst 

<choogend@library.umass.edu>

--------------- 




Chris Hoogendyk wrote:

> I have a SunRay server with 20 SunRays that are critical. They are 
> service points and there are lines of patrons at them. So I can't 
> simply take them down in the middle of the day. Furthermore, they seem 
> to be working fine.
>
> However,
>
> On my server console (E450 with Solaris 8) there are error messages 
> spinning by so fast I can't read them. The messages file has ballooned 
> to several hundred megabytes. This tells me it hasn't been going on 
> for a long time, because the rotated messages files are not this huge. 
> When I did a tail on the messages file to get a stop action of the 
> flying errors, I found the following, repeated several times a second:
>
> Feb  3 12:19:29 amen-ra-01 dtsession[15745]: [ID401707 user.error] 
> open_module:
>   /usr/lib/security/pam_authtok_get.so.1 failed: ld.so.1: 
> /usr/dt/bin/dtsession:
>   fatal: sldaputil.so.5: version 'SUNWprivate_1.2' not found
>   (required by file /usr/lib/libsldap.so.1)
> Feb  3 12:19:29 amen-ra-01 dtsession[15745]: [ID487707 user.error] 
> load modules:
>   can not open module /usr/lib/security/pam_authtok.get.so.1
>
>
> meanwhile, dtsession is eating 40% or more of the available CPU.
>
>
> I'm wondering if it might be related to having done patches recently 
> and not having rebooted yet.
>
> I also did an install of the latest Java, but I didn't think that 
> would require rebooting or affect what I'm seeing here.
>
>
> TIA
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
Received on Thu Feb 5 05:45:51 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:26 EST