SUMMARY: NIC configuration problem with SunFire V480

From: Benoît Audet <benoit.audet_at_carra.gouv.qc.ca>
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 09:47:35 EDT
Hi fellow managers,

Many thanks to all who responded to my problem, and especially to Bob
Cummings, Nathan Dietsch, Johan Wilkstrvm David B. Harrington, Mike (at
sky.net...  ...don't know the last name!), Chuck (at yahoo.com, don't no yet
the last name!) and Daniel Buchner.

Most of you directed me to the link speed settings, sending me init scripts to
use for forcing speed and disabling autonegociating.  In fact, I had made
these settings since the beginning.

As well, some  told me that on the Sun Fire V480, we must configure and fully
install both ce0 and ce1 cards in order to have at least one working
properly...   ...but that doesn't worked for me.

I received some notes about installing patches, but like I mentionned in my
original problem, I had the latest recommended patches, with these special
patches mentionned in Sun docs.

I also mentionned that I did a check on the switch port configuration and that
was true.  *But*, the test I made was to put the cable in my RJ45 port of my
laptop, I forced the laptop to be in "100Mbps, full duplex" and the laptop was
working greatly.  So that was enought to tell me that it was working well.
However, at the end of the afternoon tomorrow, I was thinking about throwing
the V480 by the window, when I remembered an odd situation I had in the past:
I was then close of giving up when we realised that the network admin had
simply "mistaken" out port, disabling it and answering to our questions "yeah,
your port is OK"...   ...so I took a drop directly from another port on the
switch and guess what??  Oh yeah, the little lights came to life on the NIC!

This was different, because this time my laptop was working well and I was in
the right subnet.  I just picked up the network guy and told him about my
problem...   At first, he obviously laught at me, but when I showed him the
lights up when connecting to the other switch, his smile turned suddenly
down...  Of course, he didn't told me what was wrong, but at least, it's now
working.

So, that's it.  Thanks for all of you, once again!

Ben Audet

_______________________________________________________________
  Benoit Audet
  Conseiller - TELUS solutions d'affaires

  Commission administrative des rigimes de retraite et d'assurances (CARRA)
  Service de l'assistance et des technologies (SAT)
  Til : 418.528.1303  (CARRA)
  benoit.audet@carra.gouv.qc.ca
  benoit.audet@telussa.com
_______________________________________________________________
Received: from mx2.rt.gouv.qc.ca (himalia.rt.gouv.qc.ca [142.213.32.22])
  by SG01.carra.gouv.qc.ca; Thu, 13 May 2004 09:36:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
  mx2.rt.gouv.qc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8205A8787C for
  <benoit.audet@carra.gouv.qc.ca>; Thu, 13 May 2004 09:36:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx2.rt.gouv.qc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
  (himalia.rt.gouv.qc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with
  ESMTP id 03062-01 for <benoit.audet@carra.gouv.qc.ca>; Thu, 13 May
  2004 09:36:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sunportal.sunmanagers.org (sunportal.sunmanagers.org
  [128.100.17.250]) by mx2.rt.gouv.qc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id
  44CD887888 for <benoit.audet@carra.gouv.qc.ca>; Thu, 13 May 2004
  09:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sunportal.sunmanagers.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
  sunportal.sunmanagers.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A861E5A8; Thu, 13
  May 2004 09:36:15 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Delivered-To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Received: from SG01.carra.gouv.qc.ca (unknown [142.213.67.120]) by
  sunportal.sunmanagers.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C41191E5A8 for
  <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>; Thu, 13 May 2004 09:36:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from GWDOM02-Message_Server by SG01.carra.gouv.qc.ca with
  Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 13 May 2004 09:35:59 -0400
Message-Id: <s0a3417f.095@SG01.carra.gouv.qc.ca>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.5.1
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:35:13 -0400
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt=20Audet?="
  <benoit.audet@carra.gouv.qc.ca>
To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 1.01b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Subject: NIC configuration problem with SunFire V480
X-BeenThere: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Sun Managers Mailing List <sunmanagers.sunmanagers.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers>,
  <mailto:sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sunportal.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/sunmanagers>
List-Post: <mailto:sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers>,
  <mailto:sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
Errors-To: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at rt.gouv.qc.ca

Hi managers,

We just received a splendid SunFire V480 here, and I have performed a Solaris
8, hardware rev. 2/02 installation on it.  On the SunFire V480, there's two
onboard cards, which are "ce0" and "ce1".  These two interfaces seem to be ok
(I've seen both with the "show-nets" command at the PROM) and at the install
of Solaris 8, I had the choice for both interfaces to use.

Currently, I plugged the "ce0" (the lower connector on the back of the
machine) in a 100Mbps - full duplex port.  I tested the port AND the cable,
plugging it in the laptop I use as the installation console and I connect
without any problem.  However, once Solaris installed and patched with the
recommended patches cluster, I can't get this "ce0" NIC interface to work!

I tryed to force it at 100Mbps - full duplex (with the ndd commands, etc.),
but I can't get this NIC to connect.  I browsed the web a bit, but found too
much contradicting informations on this, and I'm starting to get a bit lost...
I as well saw something telling that Solaris 8, hw 2/02 was not a "goob"
version to use with V480, that I should use something like Solaris 8, but
5/03...

Any workarounds, ideas?  That would be fairly welcome.  As usual, I will of
course summarise!  :-) Thanks in advance!


_______________________________________________________________
  Benoit Audet
  Conseiller - TELUS solutions d'affaires

  Commission administrative des rigimes de retraite et d'assurances (CARRA)
  Service de l'assistance et des technologies (SAT)
  Til : 418.528.1303  (CARRA)
  benoit.audet@carra.gouv.qc.ca
  benoit.audet@telussa.com
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
Received on Fri May 14 09:47:30 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:30 EST