Found it out myself, but I also got the same answers from several people: Dave Foster, Wolfgang Schwurack. Thanks to everyone who responded. ----------------------- SUMMARY ----------------------- I should've used the 'reboot -n' option to reboot the system. The '-n' option stops the system writing back the superblock when it syncs. In order to solve the problem: i) Locate an alternative superblock to use using newfs. newfs -Nv /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 # display the alternative superblocks. I used 32. # newfs -Nv /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 mkfs -F ufs -o N /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 8386767 107 27 8192 1024 96 1 167 8192 t 0 -1 8 107 n Warning: 1 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0: 8386766 sectors in 2903 cylinders of 27 tracks, 107 sectors 4095.1MB in 91 cyl groups (32 c/g, 45.14MB/g, 5632 i/g) super-block backups (for fsck -F ufs -o b=#) at: 32, 92592, 185152, 277712, 370272, 462832, 555392, 647952, 740512, 833072, 7490224, 7582784, 7675344, 7767904, 7860464, 7953024, 8045584, 8138144, 8230704, 8323264, ii) Run FSCK with the different superblock: # fsck -F ufs -o b=32 Alternate super block location: 32. ** /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 ** Last Mounted on / ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 70246 files, 1445659 used, 2682186 free (3458 frags, 334841 blocks, 0 This will also use the new superblock to FSCK all the otehr filesystems in the vfstab. iii) IMPORTANT: You have to "reboot -n" to keep that superblock. If you do not you should have the same problem as last time - I never tested this out myself. I read it on this archive: http://www.sunmanagers.org/archives/1995/1618.html but the -n option is in Sol.2.9. Regards, Simon. --- Simon Loewenthal Gemini Observatory Information Systems Group Video 139.229.33.88 Voice +56 51 205610 -----Original Message----- From: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org [mailto:sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org]On Behalf Of LOEWENTHAL Simon Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 3:29 PM To: Sun Mangers Subject: I used fsirand on the root filesystem.... :( Hi all, I was using fsirand on a Solaris 9 server. Its man page said that if you used this on the root filesystem then you should reboot immediatly afterwards, so I brought the system to single user mode and ran this: [root@gate]root$ fsirand /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 [root@gate]root$ reboot -- -s Afterward it rebooted root failed FSCK complaining that the superblock was bad: The / file system (/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0) is being checked. /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0: BAD SUPER BLOCK: BAD VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0: USE AN ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK TO SUPPLY NEEDED INFORMATION; /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0: eg. fsck [-F ufs] -o b=# [special ...] /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0: where # is the alternate super block. SEE fsck_ufs(1M). /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. WARNING - Unable to repair the / filesystem. Run fsck manually (fsck -F ufs /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0). Exit the shell when done to continue the boot process. Does anyone know how to get out of this fix? Regards, Simon. --- Simon Loewenthal Gemini Observatory Information Systems Group Video 139.229.33.88 Voice +56 51 205610 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.684 / Virus Database: 446 - Release Date: 13/05/2004 _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.684 / Virus Database: 446 - Release Date: 13/05/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.684 / Virus Database: 446 - Release Date: 13/05/2004 _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Tue May 18 10:01:43 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:32 EST