Hi, How about this arrangement? 0 Swap 2 GB 1 /(root) 20 GB (/usr, /opt, /home) 2 backup 37 GB 3 unassigned 5 GB (/var) 6 unassigned 10 GB (/export, flexible use) 7 unassigned 30 MB (future RAID purpose) Please make your comments. I will write summary 2. Once again. Thank you!! Melissa Young ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thank you very much for your help: David Foster: Bind, ISC DHCP will build and work just fine under Solaris 9. Swap should depend on memory (loosely 2 * RAM, up to max of 2GB unless you have a really large memory system). Personally I like to put /usr and /opt in /, having these separate just creates headaches and disks nowadays are big enough that you don't have to worry about space when these are combined. /var should be separate since it has globally writable directories. Anyways, whether you combine or not, make sure to allocate 4GB for / by itself, /var does not need to be 12GB, 4GB is plenty. Here is how I'd do this: swap = 2GB / = 12GB (includes /usr and /opt) /var = 4GB /home = 9GB /backup = 9GB G Hackett: Certainly make a separate file system for /var. These days most people lump /usr /home & /opt in / Helmut Kreft: Splitting / and /usr isn't really recommended any more since Sol8. I prefer to have a separate /var partition. Some say, in case of a system failure, partitions which are written to have a higher probability to be trashed. The remaining space goes to /export. Drew Skinner: This is a very difficult question for anyone. Only you really know how the system will be used. Why cut a slice for /export ? - partitions can be really annoying. I used to slice everything and no longer do it. In the end it created more administrative headaches than it ever solved. In essence I'd do the following - / whole disk (minus below) swap 4gb var 2gb (you could up var a bit if you like). The biggest danger to a non-monitored public machine is log files. For end users turn on quotas and leave the export file systems in root (/). Some people at Sun no longer separate out var - but seeing as you have radius in there I would. Harrington, David: FWIW, I'd suggest the following: Slice Use size 0 Swap 2 GB 1 /(root) 12 GB 2 backup 36 GB 6 unassigned 22 GB 7 unassigned 12-14 MB (set this aside for metadb or other RAID purposes) You can do this level of partitioning during initial installation. I refine it once the OS is installed. Slice 7 is in the event you use DiskSuite (Disk Manager in SOL9). You will need this small amount. I leave slices 3 - 6 in the format table as unassigned, and give them a size ONLY if I foresee a need for them. I assign them a directory in the /etc/vfstab file. If I wanted just 15GB I'd set 6 at 15GB, and leave a block of cylinders unaddressed. I can always bring them in later. --- Melissa Young <thesunlover2002@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Attached is the original question. Thanks Luc Suryo > and Rich Teer who suggest to use three partitions: > root, swap, and /export. > > After DNS/DHCP/RADIUS have been set, more disk(s) > will > be added to the system to make disk RAID. > > So, which type of filesystem layout is better? > Should > I make independent filesystems for /usr, /opt, /var, > /home? > > Thanks a lot. > Melissa Young > System Admin > > > --- Melissa Young <thesunlover2002@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a new project to build a server. > > Hardware: Sun Fire V100, 2 GB memory, a 37 GB hard > > disk. > > Software: Solairs 9, BIND 9.2.3 (isc), DHCP 3.0.1 > > (isc), NavisRadius 4.4.0(Lucent) > > > > Question 1: > > May I assume these new versions of BIND, DHCP and > > NavisRadius can be running very well under Solaris > > 9? > > > > Question 2: > > How about the following filesystem layout? > > > > Swap = 2 GB > > /(root) = 2 GB > > /usr = 4 GB > > /var = 12 GB > > /home = 5 GB > > /opt = 5 GB > > /backup = 5 GB > > > > Thank you!! __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/ _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Wed Jul 21 15:11:15 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:35 EST