I apologize for the delay, holidays and all. At least that is my excuse :) Thanks to Ryan and Bryan >>>fm Bryan We've setup our environment exactly as you describe.....no issues so far for us....the only difference was we upgraded our boot servers to Sparc solaris 10..... >>>fm Ryan I am doing this now. In fact, I jumpstart Solaris 8-SPARC, Solaris 10-SPARC/x86 from the same SPARC jumpstart server. I am using DHCP jumpstart for SPARC clients also. The clients use the same DHCP server even. The bootparams and DHCP methods do not really conflict with each other. > -----Original Message----- > From: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org > [mailto:sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org]On Behalf Of Al Saenz > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 11:31 AM > To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org > Subject: Solaris 8 SPARC Jumpstart Server, jumpstarting Solaris 10 > x86and Solaris 8 SPARC > > > Hello Managers, > > I just wanted to ask for your view, opinion about having a > single Jumpstart > Server running Solaris 8 SPARC that would install Solaris 8 > SPARC for some > systems and Solaris 10 x86 on other systems. > > In order to jumpstart (JS) the x86 I have to use DHCP. My > current JS server > (Sol 8 Sparc) jumpstarts other SPARC systems using good ol > /etc/ethers and > bootparams (no DHCP). I would like to keep that method for > SPARC and then add > DHCP for the x86 systems. > > Do any of you for see any problems with a setup like that? > Provided I set it up correctly, do you see any problems with > a Sol 8 Sparc js > server using bootp (/etc/ethers, bootparams) for Sparc AND > using DHCP for x86 > clients? > > Thank you very much for your time. > > Al > _______________________________________________ > sunmanagers mailing list > sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org > http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Wed Jan 3 16:29:06 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:44:03 EST