Thanks to: mh1272 (hike) Eric Voisard Dean Ross-Smith for their replies. Hike pointed out that these were indeed kern.info messages, and not errors. As such, it was simply the system informing me that there had been a memory error but the system successfully corrected it. Dean reinforced the fact that this is a lot like the Persistent, correctable memory errors that we occasionally see. As long as they don't occur in rapid succession, there is usually not a problem. Eric stated that he had seen this before on a batch of V280Rs they he had at his establishment that apparently had some weak CPUs. They passed original QA, but had to be replaced after being placed into production and running for a while under a load. I've seen that in E220Rs, too, but that was a long time ago. I simply let the customer know there was no problem here, but that we will monitor the situation to see if the messages occur more frequently. I haven't seen a repeat yet. Two documents I found a good read: Soft Memory Errors and Their Effect on SunFire Systems (thanks Eric), and Supplement to Sun Fire 6800/4810/4800/3800 Systems Troubleshooting Manual (Further description of ecache and WDC events) Thank you, all. Gene Beaird, Unix Support Engineer, Pearland, Texas No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.0/1462 - Release Date: 5/23/2008 7:20 AM _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Fri May 23 14:18:04 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:44:11 EST