Summary: Web Servers: Sun Vs Apache Vs iPlanet

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks to
---------
        Michael Cunningham
        Neil Brosnan
        Toby A. Rider
        rsaddler@cccis.com
        Jie Gao
        Adam and Christine Levin
        Marcos Assis Silva
        Erin Jones
        Ronald Loftin
        Matthew H. MORTON
        Chris Tubutis
        Andy De Petter
        Marcelo Maraboli
        Alan Olway
        hcking@acssun.pstcc.cc.tn.us
        Al Hopper
        Michael Pins
        Mick Morgan
        vogelke@c17mis.region2.wpafb.af.mi

Summary

The overwhelming consensus is Apache: it's stable, reliable, easy to
administer, and best of all, it's free. The configuration is flexable and
easy.

Sun web server is the same as/replaced by I-planet (netscape) web server.

Reference
---------
        http://www.networkcomputing.com/1020/1020f1.html

Original query
--------------
Dear Sun managers and gurus,

        We are considering different Web servers, and just wondering what
experiences you have on installing and troubleshooting on the following
web servers, including their cost, performance and reliability issues:

1. Sun Web Server
2. Apache
3. iPlanet Web/Enterprise Server

Thanks,
Janet Leung E-mail: jleung@usc.edu
ISD USC, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0251

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:13:35 CDT